Pharmacy · Business

Two Pharmacy Giants, Two Endings: What Scaling Really Takes

Faheem Ahmed··9 min read

A colleague asked me recently: “I want to buy more shops — what do you think?” My honest answer is that there’s no harm in scaling — but only if you think hard about the structure first. Because in the last couple of years, two of the UK’s biggest pharmacy groups came to an end — and the difference in how they ended is the whole lesson.

The short version — watch it on TikTok.

Before I start: this is my personal opinion and interpretation. The figures below are drawn from public reporting (Pharmacy Magazine and The Pharmaceutical Journal) and Companies House filings as reported by them. I’m not making allegations against anyone — I’m using two well-documented cases to draw a business lesson. And I don’t say any of this lightly: real people were left out of pocket, and that part isn’t a debate.

The short version

First, the honest bit about chains

I’ll be candid: for a long time I wasn’t much in favour of buying chains of pharmacies. At the end of the day it’s still a shop, with all the same hassle that owning a shop involves — and I’ve softened on that a little, because it can be done well. But the core truth doesn’t change: when you own a single pharmacy, you are the system. You’re there. You catch the problems. Open ten and you physically cannot be in ten places at once, so the business has to run on structure instead of on you. Get that right and a chain works. Get it wrong and it fails — sometimes spectacularly. Two recent cases show both endings.

Jhoots: the ending chosen for it

According to The Pharmaceutical Journal and Pharmacy Magazine, the Jhoots group expanded quickly — including buying former Lloyds branches — and then kept trading as its finances deteriorated. Employee wages reportedly went unpaid from July 2025. A number of Jhoots-linked companies entered administration, and 68 of the group’s 129 pharmacies were sold to Allied Pharmacies out of insolvency.

This is the ending nobody chooses. It kept going until creditors and administrators forced the outcome, and the branches were picked up by someone else as a distressed rescue. In the founder’s own reported words, the business grew faster than the structures needed to run it. That’s the trap: you scale the shops without scaling the systems.

The human cost isn’t a footnote.

Administrators said active employees transferred to the new owner under TUPE, so many jobs continued. But it emerged that over 100 former staff with outstanding claims are, in the administrators’ words, unlikely to receive payment — and locums were reportedly owed a substantial sum too. Whatever the business lesson, those losses are real, and they matter.

Lloyds: it chose its ending

Now compare that to LloydsPharmacy — also gone, but the sequencing was the reverse. According to Pharmacy Magazine, the owner hived every branch into a standalone company and sold them off over the course of 2023, staff transferring with them. The former multiple was renamed Diamond DCO Two Limited, and in January 2024 that leftover, largely empty company began a liquidation to wind down.

The numbers on that shell are striking. Financial documents reported by Pharmacy Magazine showed debts of £293,259,027, against just £8.2m available for “preferential creditors” and £800,000 for “unsecured creditors.” And here’s the part people find controversial: over £280m of that debt was owed to companies affiliated with the group itself — including £228m to a related company and £50m to Aurelius Crocodile, a holding company in the ownership chain.

How that works, plainly: in deals like this, the acquisition is often financed by loans pushed down into the operating business, so the company “owes” its own ownership chain large sums. When branches are sold, proceeds can flow up as repayment of those intercompany loans — which is, technically, just paying creditors. It’s that the biggest creditors sat upstairs. Whether that’s fair is a genuine public debate, and it draws criticism. But if the loans were real and documented and the sales were at market value, repaying them is lawful — even when the outcome feels uncomfortable. The queue is set by paperwork signed long before anyone’s in trouble.

The real difference: sequencing and control

Strip away the company names and the mechanics, and it comes down to two words: sequencing and control.

LloydsJhoots
OrderSold first, then wound up.Collapsed first, then sold off.
ControlStructured, planned exit.Forced by creditors / administrators.
TradingBranches kept trading, changed hands.Shops shuttered; dispensing collapsed.
In a lineChose its ending.Had its ending chosen for it.

Same destination — but one drove there and one was towed. Lloyds had structure, systems and procedures, and a business that wasn’t dependent on one person, so when the end came it was planned and executed. Jhoots didn’t, so the end happened to it. That’s not a comment on anyone’s character — it’s a comment on corporate structure.

One chose its ending while it still had choices. The other had it chosen for it.

The difference wasn’t luck. It was whether the systems, the structure and the exit plan were in place before trouble arrived.

So what does this mean for you?

There’s no harm in setting up a chain. But if you’re going to, be honest about whether you can actually manage more than one shop — the people, the finances, and the corporate structure. Because trust me, when it goes wrong, it can go very wrong, and I’ve seen it up close. If you decide to scale:

Or — don’t scale at all

Here’s the part nobody says: you don’t have to scale. Depth can beat breadth. One exceptional, well-run pharmacy or clinic — known for something, trusted, and properly governed — can be worth more than ten average shops you can’t manage. If that’s more you, my writing on building a niche pharmacy business and how to set up a chain properly are the natural next reads.

How I can help

Whether you’re weighing up a second site, building the systems to run a group safely, or deciding between breadth and depth, that’s the kind of thinking I help owners work through. Let’s make sure you scale on structure — not on hope.

Work with me

Important: this article is educational commentary and reflects my personal opinion and interpretation of publicly reported events — it is not legal, financial, tax or investment advice, and it is not an allegation of wrongdoing against any company or individual. Figures are as reported by the sources cited and may be updated as insolvency processes conclude. Take proper professional advice before making business decisions, and verify the current position from primary sources.

Frequently asked questions

Should you set up a chain of pharmacies?

There’s no harm in scaling — but only if you can genuinely manage more than one. When you own a single shop, you are the system; open ten and you can’t be everywhere, so the structure becomes everything. Before you sign the second lease, make sure you have the systems, people, financial control and understanding of corporate structure to run it — and think about your exit from the start. This is educational commentary and personal opinion, not advice.

What happened to LloydsPharmacy?

According to public reporting, the owner hived its branches into standalone companies and sold them over 2023, with the former multiple renamed Diamond DCO Two Limited; in January 2024 that shell began a liquidation. Pharmacy Magazine reported debts of £293,259,027, with about £8.2m for preferential creditors and £800,000 for unsecured creditors — and over £280m owed to affiliated companies, including £228m to a related company and £50m to Aurelius Crocodile. Whether that structure is fair is a public debate; the business point is that it was a planned exit.

What happened to Jhoots Pharmacy?

According to The Pharmaceutical Journal and Pharmacy Magazine, Jhoots kept trading as its finances deteriorated — wages unpaid from July 2025 — before Jhoots-linked companies entered administration. 68 of the group’s 129 pharmacies were sold to Allied Pharmacies out of insolvency. Active employees transferred under TUPE, but over 100 former staff with outstanding claims are, per the administrators, unlikely to be paid. Its ending was forced on it rather than chosen.

What’s the real difference between how they ended?

Sequencing and control. Lloyds sold first and wound up second — a structured exit while it still had choices. Jhoots collapsed first and was sold out of administration — its ending was chosen for it. The difference was structure, systems and control, not the company wrappers.

Do you have to scale to succeed in pharmacy?

No. Depth can be worth more than breadth. One exceptional, well-run pharmacy can be worth more than ten average ones you can’t manage. If you scale, build systems before shops; if you go deep, specialise and be the best at one thing. The mistake is scaling faster than your systems and people can support.

Faheem Ahmed

Educator, author and consultant across healthcare and education — and the voice behind The Pharmacy Guy. He helps pharmacists and owners decide when to scale, how to build the structure to do it safely, and when depth beats breadth.

Watch on YouTube →

Sources & further reading

Comments

Would you scale to a chain — or go deep on one exceptional site? And what would you want in place before signing the second lease? Tell me below; I read every comment.