Prescribing · Training

Should You Pay for a DPP? Who Should Really Foot the Bill

Faheem Ahmed··7 min read
A DPP SHOULD BE PAID — BUT BY WHOM? THE INDIVIDUAL You pay Common where no funding exists. If you do, pay for it done properly — buy cheap, buy twice. THE STATE (MY VIEW) ~£3–4k Already reimbursed in Wales. Some English ICBs are reportedly considering it. Paid to assess & mentor.
A DPP who properly assesses and mentors you is providing a real service — the honest debate is whether you or the state should be paying for it.

Should you pay for a DPP? It’s something I’ve thought about a lot — and my honest answer is that a good DPP absolutely deserves to be paid, but the person writing the cheque probably shouldn’t be you. Here’s why, and what to do if you’re stuck finding one.

The short version

This is the written companion to my short video on the same question — you can watch it on TikTok here. And if you haven’t yet, it pairs with my deeper guide on how to find a DPP in 2026.

First, why would a DPP cost anything at all?

Let’s start with the principle. I’ll be honest — philosophically I’m not even sure why we do so much for money; you can’t eat it, and we all leave this world with nothing. But paying for a service is simply convention, and it’s a fair one. Universities are paid to teach and train. You’re paid to work in a pharmacy. A taxi driver is paid for the journey. When someone provides a service, they’re paid for it.

So if a person is offering genuine tutoring and mentoring — and doing it properly, meaning they understand the assessments involved, they know what’s actually required to be a Designated Prescribing Practitioner (DPP), and they know how to assess you against the competency framework — then by convention, yes, they should be paid. That part I don’t really argue with.

The question isn’t whether a DPP is paid. It’s who pays them.

Supervising and assessing a future prescriber benefits the whole health system — not just the trainee. So should the cost really fall on the individual?

Who should actually pay — you, or the state?

This is the heart of it. Should the bill fall on you as the individual, or on the state? My view is clear: I think the state should reimburse DPPs. Training the next generation of prescribers is a public good, and the people doing that assessment and mentoring properly should be funded to do it.

And it isn’t a fantasy — it already happens in places. Wales reimburses on the order of £3,000–£4,000. More recently, someone got in touch to tell me that certain local Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in England are considering it too. The direction of travel is towards funding, even if it isn’t universal yet. The key point for every DPP to understand: you should be reimbursed for assessing and mentoring — the actual work — not simply for holding the title of DPP.

Timing matters: pharmacists qualifying from 2026 register as independent prescribers at the point of registration, so they don’t need to find a DPP separately. It’s pharmacists who qualified before that change who need a DPP to complete an independent prescribing course — which is exactly the group for whom the funding question bites. Funding rules differ across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and change over time, so check the current position with your employer, ICB or nation.

If you have to pay — make it count

In an ideal world the state picks this up. In the real world, where no funding is in place, the cost often still lands on the individual or their employer. If that’s you, my advice is simple: don’t pay for the cheapest thing — pay for the thing done properly. A DPP relationship with real assessment against the competency framework, genuine mentoring and a support network around you is worth having. Skimp on it and you’ll likely feel it later — buy cheap, buy twice.

And reframe the spend while you’re at it. People happily drop money on the newest phone and the latest gadgets. If that money has to be spent somewhere, why not put it into education that expands your scope of practice and moves your career forward? Few investments compound the way your own competence does.

Struggling to find a DPP? Do this first

Before you pay anyone, work your network — it’s free and often faster than you’d think:

For the full step-by-step, see my in-depth guide: how to find a DPP in 2026.

Who pays?RealityMy take
The individualCommon where no funding exists.Understandable, but not how it should be.
The employerSometimes covered as development.Fair — worth asking before you self-fund.
The stateWales ~£3–4k; some ICBs considering.Where it should sit — it’s a public good.

How I can help

If you’re trying to secure a DPP, develop your clinical skills, or set up a private clinic or consultancy, that’s the work I do. I can help you access a DPP, arrange training that’s done properly, and build the governance around it. (You might also find my writing on demonstrating clinical competence and the GPhC fitness-to-practise process useful.)

Work with me

Important: this article is educational commentary and reflects my personal opinion on DPP funding — it is not legal, financial or professional-regulatory advice. DPP eligibility, course requirements and funding arrangements differ across the UK nations and change over time. Verify the current position with your employer, ICB, training provider and the relevant regulator or professional body before you commit.

Frequently asked questions

Do you have to pay for a DPP?

There’s no universal rule, but by convention a professional who provides a real service is paid for it — and a DPP who genuinely assesses and mentors you, understands the assessments required and knows how to assess you against the competency framework is doing exactly that. So it’s reasonable that they’re paid. The better question is who should pay: the individual, or the state.

Who should pay for a DPP — you or the state?

In my view the state should reimburse DPPs, because supervising and assessing a trainee prescriber benefits the whole system. It already happens in places — Wales reimburses on the order of £3,000–£4,000, and some English ICBs are reportedly considering it — but it isn’t universal, so in many cases the individual still pays. Check what funding your employer, ICB or nation offers first.

Do pharmacists qualifying in 2026 need a DPP?

No. Pharmacists qualifying from 2026 register as independent prescribers at the point of registration, so they don’t need to find a DPP separately. It’s pharmacists who qualified before that change who need a DPP to complete an independent prescribing course — part of why the funding question matters so much for that group.

How much does a DPP cost?

It varies. In Wales, DPPs are reimbursed on the order of £3,000–£4,000, and some English ICBs are considering reimbursement, so the trainee may not pay directly. Where no funding is in place, the cost is often met by the individual or employer. If you do pay, pay for it done properly — buy cheap, buy twice.

Is it worth paying for a DPP?

If the support is done properly — genuine assessment against the competency framework, real mentoring and a support network — then yes, it can be money well spent. People happily invest in the newest phone; investing in education that advances your scope of practice is at least as worthwhile. Just avoid the cheapest option for its own sake.

Faheem Ahmed

Educator, author and consultant across healthcare and education — and the voice behind The Pharmacy Guy. He supports clinicians, teams and prospective prescribers through teaching, training and consultancy, including access to DPPs and prescribing pathways.

Watch on YouTube →

Further reading

Comments

Do you think the state should pay for DPPs — or should it stay with the individual? I’d genuinely like your thoughts. Leave a comment below; I read them all.