Independent Prescribing

Community Pharmacy Independent Prescribing: Is It Worth It?

Faheem Ahmed··8 min read
WHERE PRESCRIBING STANDS Wales & Scotland — prescribing is already live In use across community pharmacy — effectively their own prescription pad. England — about five conditions from August Nationally-agreed list (conjunctivitis, respiratory, skin) — not open prescribing. No national IP framework yet. The liability stays with you A PGD-style framework lowers the risk — but it never removes it. Diagnose, don’t just prescribe Prescribing is not diagnosing. Get the training or you’ll get into trouble.
The UK picture: Wales and Scotland already prescribing, England starting narrow — and the risk, either way, sitting with the pharmacist.

There’s a lot of talk about community pharmacy independent prescribing right now, and a lot of it is hype. So let me answer the three questions I actually get asked: is NHS community pharmacy really going to use independent prescribing? What are the risks and benefits? And what does it mean for your wage? Here’s the honest version — no spin.

The honest summary

1. Is community pharmacy actually going to use independent prescribing?

Short answer: yes — but the first thing you have to do is separate the four nations. This is a devolved health service, and the picture in England is nothing like the picture in Wales or Scotland.

In Wales and Scotland, prescribing already exists in community pharmacy, and it’s being used — to the extent that the individuals who can prescribe effectively have their own prescription pad, or something very close to it. They’re not waiting for a policy announcement; they’re already doing it. If you want a preview of where England is heading, look there.

In England, it’s different — we don’t have that yet. There’s been a lot of noise about the roughly £340 million of funding, about pharmacists “prescribing from August”, and so on. The honest answer to “is it happening?” is yes and no. Yes, prescribing is coming. But there is no national independent prescribing framework in England yet. What’s actually been agreed is a limited set of around five clinical conditions — think along the lines of conjunctivitis, some respiratory presentations, and certain skin or hay-fever-type conditions — that will be nationally agreed for pharmacists to prescribe against.

That is not open, independent prescribing across a broad range. You don’t get to say, “right, I’ve got my pad, I’ll prescribe whatever I think.” It doesn’t work like that. Over time I’d expect it to broaden — England will probably move towards where Wales and Scotland already are — but as it stands right now, it’s those five conditions, starting around August or September.

England vs Wales & Scotland: the reality

AreaWales & ScotlandEngland (now)
StatusPrescribing already live and in use.Launching from around August–September.
ScopeBroad — effectively their own prescription pad.About five nationally-agreed conditions only.
FrameworkEstablished prescribing pathways.No national independent prescribing framework yet.
What you can treatA wide and growing range.Conjunctivitis, respiratory, some skin / hay-fever presentations.
Direction of travelContinuing to expand.Likely to broaden over time — but not yet.

2. What are the risks and the benefits?

This is the interesting one. My read is that those five conditions won’t be dropped on you with no support — there’ll almost certainly be some sort of framework wrapped around them, probably PGD-style, to guide what you do. And that’s a good thing for risk: doing this inside a national governance structure is less risky than prescribing totally on your own, because there’s scaffolding around your decisions.

But — and this is the part people skate over — the liability still stands with you. A framework reduces your risk; it does not remove it. Whenever you’re prescribing, there is risk, full stop. So the benefit (structure, support, a defined scope) comes with a permanent condition attached: you have to be trained properly. Without the right training you will genuinely struggle.

And here’s the distinction I want to hammer home, because it’s where people get into trouble: prescribing is not the same as diagnosing. The clever bit isn’t signing the prescription — it’s correctly working out what’s in front of you. You need to be able to diagnose, not just prescribe. If your diagnostic skills aren’t up to it, a prescribing qualification just gives you a faster way to be wrong. Get that training right and the risk is manageable; skip it and you’re exposed.

If you’re not yet a prescriber, that’s the first practical step — and finding the right supervisor is half the battle. I’ve written separately on how to find a DPP. And if you’re thinking about building a private service on top of the NHS work, the governance side matters enormously — that’s all in how to set up an online prescribing service.

A framework lowers your risk. It never removes it — the liability is always yours.

Prescribing inside a national, PGD-style structure is safer than going it alone. But you still own the decision, and prescribing without proper diagnostic training is where pharmacists come unstuck.

3. What does it mean for your wage? The honest bit

This is what everyone actually wants to know, so let me be straight. The consultation fee for these services is roughly the bog-standard £17-plus per item or consultation. Now — how much of that does the employed pharmacist see? That’s a conversation you have to have with the owner. It doesn’t automatically land in your pay packet.

Before you march in demanding a cut, understand how a pharmacy actually makes money. It used to come largely through the margin on dispensing medicines. That balance has shifted — funding has moved out of the medicine margin and into services. So when you look at it and think, “this pharmacy’s getting £17 a time and doing 100 consultations, I want a piece of that,” — yes, perhaps. But a lot of money has been moved around to fund these services in the first place, so the real profit margin isn’t as fat as the headline £17 × 100 makes it look.

Which is why, honestly, I can’t see hourly wages jumping off the back of this right now. A pharmacist’s basic might be around £20 to £24 an hour as a base, topped up through services. I don’t see the model where you get £35–£40 an hour on top of your service income being sustainable, because pharmacies will genuinely struggle to fund it. That’s not me being pessimistic — it’s just the maths of where the money sits.

So my advice: understand the owner’s position, then negotiate from an informed place. If you want to know what’s realistically on the other side of the table, it’s worth understanding how much a pharmacy owner actually makes before you sit down. And I do believe there’ll be levels to prescribing — if you’re genuinely good at it, you can negotiate and do well. This isn’t “everyone gets the same rate.” The strong prescribers will earn it.

So — is it worth it?

Yes, on balance — with conditions. It’s going to happen. It benefits patients. The profession is clearly changing direction, and you can see that not just in prescribing but in the relaxation around supervision too. Standing against the tide isn’t a career strategy.

But the individual pharmacist has to be trained properly, because the risk to you increases. That’s the trade. And if you want to see where England is heading, don’t just read the press releases — look at Wales and Scotland, where they’re already prescribing a lot more. That’s your roadmap.

Get the training right, understand the money, and negotiate from knowledge rather than hope — and community pharmacy independent prescribing is absolutely worth getting on board with.

If you need help developing your prescribing skills for these conditions, or you’re looking for a DPP to get qualified, get in touch. I run structured training through medlrn.co.uk, and I mentor pharmacists directly. Happy to help.

Work with me

Important: this article is educational commentary on where community pharmacy prescribing is heading — it is not legal, regulatory, financial or clinical advice, and the details (conditions, timelines and funding) are as I understand them and may change. Prescribing carries real professional and regulatory obligations; check the current guidance for your nation and regulator (GPhC, NHS England, NHS Wales, NHS Scotland as applicable), ensure you have appropriate training, indemnity and supervision, and take independent professional advice before you prescribe.

Frequently asked questions

Is NHS community pharmacy in England actually going to use independent prescribing?

Yes — but not in the way the headlines suggest, and not yet at scale. In Wales and Scotland community pharmacy prescribing already exists and is being used, to the point that those pharmacists effectively have their own prescription pad. England is behind. There’s a lot of talk about the roughly £340 million of funding and pharmacists “prescribing from August”, and the honest answer is yes and no. There is no national independent prescribing framework in England yet. What’s coming is a limited, nationally-agreed set of around five clinical conditions — not open prescribing across the board.

Which conditions will community pharmacists in England be able to prescribe for?

The starting point is a small, nationally-agreed set of about five clinical conditions — think along the lines of conjunctivitis, some respiratory presentations, and certain skin or hay-fever-type conditions — expected to come into play around August or September. You cannot simply pick up a pad and prescribe anything you like. Over time it’s likely to broaden, but right now the design is a defined list, not open independent prescribing.

Is it really ‘independent’ prescribing, or something more limited?

For most community pharmacists in England at launch it’s more limited than the phrase suggests. The five conditions are likely to sit inside a PGD-style framework that wraps governance around what you do, which actually reduces your risk compared with prescribing entirely on your own. It is not a licence to prescribe whatever you want. If you want to see where genuinely broad community prescribing looks like, look at Wales and Scotland.

Does independent prescribing mean a higher wage for employed pharmacists?

Honestly, I can’t see wages jumping right now. The consultation fee is roughly the bog-standard £17-plus per item or consultation, but whether the employed pharmacist sees any of that is a conversation to have with the owner. A pharmacist’s basic might be around £20 to £24 an hour, topped up through services — and I don’t see £35 to £40 an hour on top of service income being sustainable, because pharmacies will struggle to fund it. Understand how the pharmacy actually makes money, then negotiate from an informed position. There will be levels to prescribing: if you’re good, you can do well.

Is community pharmacy prescribing worth the extra risk?

It’s going to happen, it benefits patients, and the profession is clearly moving this way — so for most pharmacists it’s worth getting on board. But the risk to you as an individual increases. Even inside a supportive framework, the liability stays with you, and prescribing always carries risk. The key is proper training — and remember that prescribing is not the same as diagnosing. You need to be able to diagnose, not just prescribe, or you’ll get into trouble. Get trained properly and it’s worth it; go in half-prepared and it isn’t.

Faheem Ahmed

Educator, author and consultant across healthcare and education — and the voice behind The Pharmacy Guy. A pharmacist and independent prescriber, he has built and run clinical services and community pharmacies, and supports clinicians, teams and prospective owners through teaching, training, mentoring and consultancy.

Watch on YouTube →

Further reading

Comments

Prescribing in your pharmacy already, waiting on the England rollout, or negotiating your rate with an owner? Tell me how it’s going, or ask me to go deeper on training, DPPs or the money in a follow-up. Leave a comment below — I read them all.